Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From greg@turnstep.com
Subject Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date
Msg-id b6f8aaff1767dd88bb2516a28ab3520b@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message


> Go back and reread the end of it.  The first part was about the ads,
> the second was about mirrors.

Sorry for the confusion: Dave is right, I just asked the question wrong. 
I am not really concerned about the mirrors, but how much traffic the 
main portal endures, and if that number justifies the putting of 
advertisements on the site.

The answer to the first appears to be about 320 MB per day, or about 
9 gigs per month. Not too shabby, but not too bad either. To be 
totally fair, we should also factor in all the other sites (subdomains) 
that hub.org is providing.

I see the big questions as:

What prompted the redesign to put the ads on every page of the site, 
when before they were only on the opening "flags" page?


How much monthly revenue do the ads bring in, and can we (the community) 
provide an alternative to this income, perhaps via direct contributions?


--
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200301131149

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE+Iu5+vJuQZxSWSsgRAjkSAJ9Yit8t0GIwigsdf5DZtDVA71vZCgCgz29S
kgC4JGdxFigBpjaHH9KFnaA=
=z1RC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!?
Next
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_get_constraintdef