On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber writes:
>
> > For example:
> >
> > insert into foo(foo.a) values(1);
> >
> > fails because the table name is used. Update statements also include the
> > table name. Both fail. Does anyone know of a workaround?
>
> Completely loudly to whomever wrote that SQL. It's completely
> non-standard.
>
> (The implication I'm trying to make is that there's no way to make
> PostgreSQL accept that statement. Adding this as an extension has been
> rejected in the past.)
Yeah, that's kinda what I expected. There's just under 1700 insert and
update statements but only 1200 selects. Neither option sounds good at
this point.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo
atPop4 Networking Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore
http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
