Re: "SQL" REPLACE SYNTAX - Mailing list pgsql-php
From | Vince Vielhaber |
---|---|
Subject | Re: "SQL" REPLACE SYNTAX |
Date | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.40.0201230617150.21516-100000@paprika.michvhf.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: "SQL" REPLACE SYNTAX (Andrew McMillan <andrew@catalyst.net.nz>) |
Responses |
Re: "SQL" REPLACE SYNTAX
|
List | pgsql-php |
On 23 Jan 2002, Andrew McMillan wrote: > I realise this wanders far from the SQL standard, but it's one of those > areas where the standard is awkward from an application programmer's > point of view. I would certainly love to see some syntax of this kind > available. If having to work out the primary key from schema queries is > too much work, then why not have a syntax that explicitly coped - after > all the whole thing is non-standard, so we don't have to follow MySQL's > lead on it: > > INSERT OR REPLACE <table> ( <field list> ) > VALUES( <value list> ) WHERE <condition> > > would be just fine by me. > > There are many places in my programs where I want to do this sort of > INSERT OR REPLACE functionality and the ability to do so would make my > code more maintainable, and much less prone to stupid errors. > > More simply (?) I want to be able to build the fields / values for my > query and then decide at the last minute whether I was doing an INSERT > or an UPDATE. > > To do this (without throwing an error) I currently do a "SELECT ... > WHERE <condition>;" and then construct my SQL appropriately. When I add > a new column to a table (this is the real world :-) I frequently forget > to maintain one branch of the resulting code building the SQL statement. > > It is this need that Manuel is catering for by implementing the > functionality in Metabase, but I expect it would be more efficient to > implement it in PostgreSQL natively. INSERT OR REPLACE table1(a,b,c) VALUES(1,2,3) WHERE a=3 and b=4 and c=5; On the surface it looks ok. But.. What happens if you have a table that isn't just a,b,c there are actually a,b,c,d,e,f and there are more than one tuple with a=3 and b=4 and c=5? Do you replace them all or throw an error? Isn't this what Chris was eluding to? BTW, INSERT OR UPDATE seems more appropriate since you'd be doing an UPDATE if the row already exists. I think that's also what Oracle uses. Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ==========================================================================