Re: are there plans for a threaded alternative to multiple daemons? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: are there plans for a threaded alternative to multiple daemons?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.33.0104281646210.411-100000@mobile.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to are there plans for a threaded alternative to multiple daemons?  ("Clayton Vernon" <cvernon@enron.com>)
Responses Re: are there plans for a threaded alternative to multiple daemons?
List pgsql-general
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Clayton Vernon wrote:

> I was wondering what the plans were for PostgreSQL to convert to the
> one process multithreaded approach, as Apache, Interbase and others
> are doing?

there has been talk about doing some threads actions inside of a
process, but, if I recall my read of Apache2, they are still doing
multi-process, with threading inside of each process ...



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jack Bates
Date:
Subject: On the _need_ to vacuum...
Next
From: Sterling
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL Where Like - Range it?!