Re: UNION bug in 7.1.3? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stephan Szabo
Subject Re: UNION bug in 7.1.3?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0110222311001.49557-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to UNION bug in 7.1.3?  (Keary Suska <hierophant@pcisys.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Keary Suska wrote:

> The following syntax, which works fine in 7.0.3, fails in 7.1.3:
>
> SELECT t1.col1, t2.col2 FROM table1 t1, table2 t2
> WHERE t1.col3 = t2.col4
> UNION
> SELECT t1.col1, NULL FROM table1 t1
> WHERE t1.col3 NOT IN (SELECT t2.col2 FROM table2 t2)
> ORDER BY t1.col1
>
> Fails with "ERROR:  Relation 't1' does not exist".
>
> It seems to be in the "order by" clause. So, if I do:
>
> SELECT t1.col1, t2.col2 FROM table1 t1, table2 t2
> WHERE t1.col3 = t2.col4
> UNION
> SELECT t1.col1, NULL FROM table1 t1
> WHERE t1.col3 NOT IN (SELECT t2.col2 FROM table2 t2)
> ORDER BY table1.col1
>
> The above error goes away, but is replaced by "ERROR:  ORDER BY on a
> UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT result must be on one of the result columns". Is this
> a bug? It doesn't even work when using full table names instead of aliases.

I think an ORDER BY col1 will do what you want, since ISTM col1 is the
column name in the query expression of the select union select.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Erol Öz"
Date:
Subject: pg_dump - getTables() problem
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: oid not "UNIQUE" for use as FOREIGN KEY?