Re: Performance aggregates - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stephan Szabo
Subject Re: Performance aggregates
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0105150825190.22428-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Performance aggregates  (snpe <snpe@infosky.net>)
Responses Re: Performance aggregates
Re: Performance aggregates
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 15 May 2001, snpe wrote:

> Table e_kalkn have 4668 rows and e_kalkns 101170 rows.
>
> Query :
>
> select roba,sum(izn)
>  from e_kalkn k,e_kalkns ks
>  where k.id=ks.id
>  group by roba
>  order by roba
>
> is 2.5 times faster on one commercial database (there are tests on Internet
> that say 'Postgresql is faster than that database).
> I can't say which database it is.

Have you run vacuum analyze (since loading the data) and what does explain
show for the query.  Also, what version are you using?


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas F. O'Connell"
Date:
Subject: locking a dropped table
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: locking a dropped table