On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, xuyifeng wrote:
> no doubt, I have touched some problems PG has, right? if PG is so good,
> is there any necessary for the team to improve PG again?
There is always room for improvements for any software package ... whether
it be PgSQL, Linux, FreeBSD or PHPBuilder ... as ppl learn more,
understand more and come up with new techniques, things tend to get better
...
> > Regards,
> XuYifeng
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
> To: xuyifeng <jamexu@telekbird.com.cn>; <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version
>
>
> > At 04:17 PM 11/28/00 +0800, xuyifeng wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > > how long is PG7.1 already in beta testing? can it be released before Christmas day?
> > > can PG7.1 will recover database from system crash?
> >
> > This guy's a troll from the PHP Builder's site (at least, Tim Perdue and I suspect this
> > due to some posts he made in regard to Tim's SourceForge/Postgres article).
> >
> > Since he's read Tim's article, and at least some of the follow-up posts (given that
> > he's posted responses himself), he should know by now that PG 7.1 is still in a pre-beta
> > state and won't be released before Christmas day. I also posted a fairly long answer
> > to a question Tim's posted at phpbuilder.com regarding recoverability and this guy's
> > undoubtably read it, too.
> >
> > Have I forgotten anything, xuyifeng?
> >
> >
> >
> > - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
> > Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
> > Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
> > http://donb.photo.net.
> >
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
