Re: beta testing version - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From xuyifeng
Subject Re: beta testing version
Date
Msg-id 001901c0594e$0ae254a0$e001a8c0@xyf
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Please advise features in 7.1 (SUMMARY)  (Andrew Snow <als@fl.net.au>)
Responses Re: beta testing version  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
Re: beta testing version  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
no doubt,  I have touched some problems PG has, right?  if PG is so good,  
is there any necessary for the team  to improve PG again?

Regards,
XuYifeng

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
To: xuyifeng <jamexu@telekbird.com.cn>; <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version


> At 04:17 PM 11/28/00 +0800, xuyifeng wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >   how long is PG7.1 already in beta testing? can it be released before Christmas day?
> >   can PG7.1  will recover database from system crash?
> 
> This guy's a troll from the PHP Builder's site (at least, Tim Perdue and I suspect this
> due to some posts he made in regard to Tim's SourceForge/Postgres article).
> 
> Since he's read Tim's article, and at least some of the follow-up posts (given that
> he's posted responses himself), he should know by now that PG 7.1 is still in a pre-beta
> state and won't be released before Christmas day.  I also posted a fairly long answer
> to a question Tim's posted at phpbuilder.com regarding recoverability and this guy's
> undoubtably read it, too.
> 
> Have I forgotten anything, xuyifeng?
> 
> 
> 
> - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
>   Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
>   Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
>   http://donb.photo.net.
> 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: RE: Constraint names using 'user namespace'?
Next
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: beta testing version