On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Steve Wolfe <steve@iboats.com> [001031 13:47] wrote:
> >
> > > > (Incidentally, we've toyed around with developping a
> > query-caching
> > > > system that would sit betwen PostgreSQL and our DB libraries.
> > >
> > > Sounds amazing, but requires some research, I guess. However, in
> > many
> > > cases one would be more than happy with cahced connections. Of
> > course,
> > > cahced query results can be naturally added to that, but just
> > connections
> > > are OK to start with. Security....
> >
> > To me, it doesn't sound like it would be that difficult of a project, at
> > least not for the likes of the PostgreSQL developpers. It also doesn't seem
> > like it would really introduce any security problems, not if it were done
> > inside of PostgreSQL. Long ago, I got sidetracked from my endeavors in C,
> > and so I don't feel that I'm qualified to do it. (otherwise, I would have
> > done it already. : ) ) If you wanted it done in Perl or Object Pascal, I
> > could help. : )
> >
> > Here's a simple design that I was tossing back and forth. Please
> > understand that I'm not saying this is the best way to do it, or even a good
> > way to do it. Just a possible way to do it. I haven't been able to give it
> > as much thought as I would like to. Here goes.
> >
> > ------------
> > Implementation
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> Implemented stored proceedures for
> postgresql but still hasn't been approached to integrated them.
someone has to approach him to integrate them? *raised eyebrow*
Karel, where did things stand the last time this was brought up? We
haven't gone beta yet, can you re-submit a patch for v7.1 before beta so
that we can integrate the changes? *Maybe*, if possible, submit it such
that its a compile time option, so that its there if someone like Alfred
wants to be brave, but it won't zap everyone if there is a bug?
