Re: table count limitation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From andrew@ugh.net.au
Subject Re: table count limitation
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0008280919240.65040-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: table count limitation  (Miles Thompson <milesthompson@sprint.ca>)
List pgsql-general

On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Miles Thompson wrote:

> Other columns could simply be labelled "descrip1", "descrip2", "descrip3", as
> many as you need, for the different attributes of each item. So "descrip1" may

Now someone once said to me "If you find your labeling your fields x1, x2,
x3... then your design is wrong." His next step would be to ask for your
ER diagram :-)

Have you tried inheritance? i.e you will have a product, inheriting from
that you will have computers, boats, cars etc. Perhaps from boats you
could have sail boats, motor boats etc as you store different attributes.

As postgresql is an OORBMS it should be able to handle it without any
nasty squash into the relational model tricks.

I've never used an OO database in production mind you...perhaps there is
some catch I'm not aware of.

Andrew


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pure ODBMS (fwd)
Next
From: Miles Thompson
Date:
Subject: Re: table count limitation