Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0006201949570.1098-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com> writes:
> > At least on UNIX, couldn't you use a hard-link and change the name in
> > pg_class immediately? Let the brain-dead operating systems use the
> > vacuum method.
> 
> Hmm ... maybe, but it doesn't seem worth the portability headache to
> me.  We do have an NT port that we don't want to break, and I don't
> think RENAME TABLE is worth the trouble of testing/supporting two
> implementations.
> 
> Even on Unix, aren't there filesystems that don't do hard links?
> Not that I'd recommend running Postgres on such a volume, but...

tTo the best of my knowledge, its only symlinks that aren't
(weren't?) universally supported ... somehow, I believe taht even extends
to NT ...




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: RE: Big 7.1 open items
Next
From: Ryan Kirkpatrick
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!