Re: [SQL] 2 million+ entries - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Michael Richards
Subject Re: [SQL] 2 million+ entries
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.10.9908260249250.27017-100000@scifair.acadiau.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [SQL] 2 million+ entries  ("G. Anthony Reina" <reina@nsi.edu>)
List pgsql-sql
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, G. Anthony Reina wrote:

> That's fantastic! How much did that set you back? Are there any special
> quirks about using Postgres on a multiple processor, multiple disk
> system?

Oops. To answer your second question. No. None whatsoever. The multi-disk
array is handled by the RAID controller. To the OS it appears to be a
gigantic disk. The RAID controller also has hardware cache so it can do
nifty things like queue a large number of simultaneous requests and
elevator sort them for seek efficiency. The machine also has a large
amount of RAM.

If you really need high performance, I've done nifty things like putting
indexes on different disks. Postgres does not seem to have a problem with
tables which have been physically moved and replace with symbolic links. I
don't know how well it would handle DROP queries, but I'm not in the habit
of dropping 10Gb tables very often.

-Michael



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Michael Richards
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] 2 million+ entries
Next
From: Haris Susanto
Date:
Subject: money format