Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.3.96.980531154233.336T-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?  (dg@illustra.com (David Gould))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 31 May 1998, David Gould wrote:

> > On Sun, 31 May 1998, David Gould wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks. One question, is there any reason we can't use the intx tests on
> > > all the platforms? I realize that float it another set of problems, but it
> > > seems that int should be be the same?
> >
> > 10c10
> > < ERROR:  pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Result too large
> > ---
> > > ERROR:  pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Math result not representable
> >
> > The changes are more error message relatd then anything...
> >
> > Marc G. Fournier
> > Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> > primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
>
> Thats what I thought. So can we just rename the int*-*BSD.out to int*.out?

    No cause then that will break the Linux regression tests :)

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?