Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
Date
Msg-id 9805312207.AA27447@hawk.illustra.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > On Sun, 31 May 1998, David Gould wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks. One question, is there any reason we can't use the intx tests on
> > > > all the platforms? I realize that float it another set of problems, but it
> > > > seems that int should be be the same?
> > >
> > > 10c10
> > > < ERROR:  pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Result too large
> > > ---
> > > > ERROR:  pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Math result not representable
> > >
> > > The changes are more error message relatd then anything...
> > >
> > Thats what I thought. So can we just rename the int*-*BSD.out to int*.out?
>
>     No cause then that will break the Linux regression tests :)

For the "int" tests?  I hope not. Anyhow, I will test this and see if I can
clean up some regression issues. I plan to break a lot of stuff in the next
few weeks (ok, months) and sure want to be able to count on the regression
suite to help me find my way.

-dg


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] custom types and optimization
Next
From: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?