On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> > Couldn't this be tested for, just like there is a "flex test" which
> > finds out if flex is ok or not? Can the configure script find out and
> > add HAVE_INT_TIMEZONE if appropriate?
>
> Uh, it does a test already by trying to compile a program referencing a
> global integer variable called "timezone". Somehow a few systems will
> compile that but don't really have a useful integer timezone
> (RH5.0/glibc2.0 is one of those).
>
> I'm wondering if we could change the sense of the test, to try instead
> to test for the presence of a timezone field in the tm structure? That
> might fix the glibc2.0 port (assuming it still has problems at v2.0.7;
> haven't tested recently) but I don't know which other ports might break.
>
> Can we experiment with this Marc?? Post-megapatch of course :)
Sounds reasonable to me...so you want the test changed to:
===========================================================================
#include <stdio.h>
#include <time.h>
main() { struct tm *tmstruct; printf("%s\n", tmstruct->timezone); }
===========================================================================
And, if the compile fails...how is HAVE_INT_TIMEZONE set? to
FALSE?
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
