Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.3.96.980316234834.304I-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> > This is going to be pretty tough to test on every platform we support,
> > so if it is done now, it will have to be done carefully.
>
> Is this behavior in v6.2.x? In any case, if it is anything but minimally
> trivial, it should be given a test on every supported platform, since it
> hits the heart of the platform-specific code, doesn't it? Seems like it
> should be put into the CVS tree and shaken out until the next release...

    Not realizing what was involved, I have to agree here...*after* I
get a post-release patch out on Sunday? :)

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6