Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > I'm very glad to see this. But is a nicer name possible? To perl
> > programmers at least, "substitute" should make sense.
>
> What is the matter with replace? We already have replace:
>
> test=> \df replace
> List of functions
> Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types
> ------------+---------+------------------+---------------------
> pg_catalog | replace | text | text, text, text
>
I think that regexp_replace is a good name. It is easy to understand.
regards,
--- Atsushi Ogawa
