RE: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests
Date
Msg-id OSCPR01MB14966AF5256A5D44E64DC9FB7F56FA@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Fujii-san,

> A bit similar discussion came up before regarding pgbench and program_xxx_ok
> in [1], but it seems that change was never applied.

I didn't know that, thanks for sharing. ISTM, it tried to extend function to test the
shorter options.

While verifying the idea, I found that pg_config and pg_bsd_indent have not been
supported "-V" option yet. They must address the option ro improve test functions.

Attached patch set implemented the idea. 0001 is my original point and can be
backported. 0002-0004 needs API changes so they aim to be applied for HEAD.

If possible, I want to fork another thread to discuss 0002-0004 and want to
concentrate 0001 here.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: torikoshia
Date:
Subject: Re: expand on_error ignore error handling scope
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands