Dear Amit,
> I understand that we may not have a clear use case for this to work in
> single-user mode. But how will we define the boundary in similar
> cases? I mean, we should have some rule for such exposed functions,
> and it should be followed uniformly. Now, if one needs a bigger or
> complex change to make the function work in single-user mode, then it
> is easy to take an exception from what is currently being followed in
> the code. However, if the change is as trivial as you proposed in the
> first email, why not go with that and make this function work in
> single-user mode?
Hmm, the opinion about this is completely opposite with other reviewers. I want
to ask them again how you feel. I also added Tom who pointed out in the initial
thread.
Question: how you feel to restrict SQL functions for slot during the single-user
mode? Nobody has considered use cases for it; we do not have concrete theory and
similar cases. And needed band-aid to work seems very small.
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
