Hi
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 9:14 AM Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
> > I think it's better to have index AM (and perhaps table AM) control it
> > instead of filtering in XLogInsert(). Because otherwise third-party
> > access methods that use LSN like gist indexes cannot write WAL records
> > at all when wal_level = none even if they want.
>
> Hm, third-party extensions use RM_GENERIC_ID, so it should probably be
> allowed in XLogInsert() as well instead of allowing control in some other way.
> It's not unnatural that WAL records for in-core AMs are filtered in XLogInsert().
I updated the patch following this discussion,
and fixed the documentation as well.
No failure is found during make check-world.
Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi
