Hello
On Friday, Nov 20, 2020 9:33 AM Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
> > At Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:04:17 -0500, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
> > > * Laurenz Albe (laurenz.albe@cybertec.at) wrote:
> > > > I missed that this is only a warning when I looked at it before.
> > > > Yes, it should be a fatal error.
> > >
> > > Yeah, the more that I think about it, the more that I tend to agree
> > > with this. Does anyone want to argue against changing this into a
> FATAL..?
> >
> > I don't come up with a use case where someone needs to set
> > wal_level=minimal for archive recovery. So +1 to change it to FATAL.
It seems we reached the agreement for this fix.
> Thank you all. I'd like to give Osumi-san an opportunity to write a patch and
> showing the evidence of successful test if you don't mind. He is very young
> and newbie to Postgres, so even a small contribution would encourage him to
> make further contributions.
Sure. Let me do that, including the test.
Best,
Takamichi Osumi
