RE: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress
Date
Msg-id OSBPR01MB48880D8D2966FE8711F5BBB0ED8A9@OSBPR01MB4888.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress  ("osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>)
Responses RE: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress
Re: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress
List pgsql-hackers
On Thursday, October 28, 2021 11:19 PM I wrote:
> I've created a new patch that extends pg_stat_subscription_workers to include
> other transaction statistics.
> 
> Note that this patch depends on v18 patch-set in [1]...
Rebased based on the v19 in [1].
Also, fixed documentation a little and made tests tidy.
FYI, the newly included TAP test(027_worker_xact_stats.pl) is stable
because I checked that 100 times of its execution in a tight loop all passed.


[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoDY-9_x819F_m1_wfCVXXFJrGiSmR2MfC9Nw4nW8Om0qA%40mail.gmail.com


Best Regards,
    Takamichi Osumi


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing include in be-secure-openssl.c?