On Tuesday, April 20, 2021 10:53 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 2:04 PM osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com
> <mailto:osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com> <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com
> <mailto:osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com> > wrote:
>
> No problem. Thank you for updating the patch.
> I've conducted some cosmetic changes. Could you please check
> this ?
> That's already applied by pgindent.
>
> I executed RT for this and made no failure.
> Just in case, I executed 010_truncate.pl <http://010_truncate.pl>
> test 100 times in a tight loop,
> which also didn't fail.
>
> I reviewed the patch, ran make check, no issues. One minor comment:
>
> Could you add the comment similar to RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap() on why
> the redo, it's not very obvious to someone reading the code, why we are
> refetching the index list here.
>
> + /* Check if we need to redo */
>
> + newindexoidlist = RelationGetIndexList(relation);
Yeah, makes sense. Fixed.
Its indents seem a bit weird but came from pgindent.
Thank you for your review !
Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi
