RE: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS
Date
Msg-id OS0PR01MB6113F6FF2B6BC473BDEC8B47FB689@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS
List pgsql-hackers
From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
>I analyzed performance of parallel inserts in CTAS for different cases
>with tuple size 32bytes, 59bytes, 241bytes and 1064bytes. We could
>gain if the tuple sizes are lower. But if the tuple size is larger
>i..e 1064bytes, there's a regression with parallel inserts.

Thanks for the update.
BTW, May be you have some more testcases that can reproduce this regression easily.
Can you please share some of the testcase (with big tuple size) with me.

Regards,
Tang



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow an alias to be attached directly to a JOIN ... USING
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: About to add WAL write/fsync statistics to pg_stat_wal view