RE: Added schema level support for publication. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Subject | RE: Added schema level support for publication. |
Date | |
Msg-id | OS0PR01MB611393384AB6280030A24FC6FBE19@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Added schema level support for publication. (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Added schema level support for publication.
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday, July 16, 2021 6:10 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 6:25 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > Wednesday, July 14, 2021 6:17 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:06 PM tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com > > > <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Monday, July 12, 2021 5:36 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this issue, this issue is fixed in the v10 > > > > > patch attached at [1]. > > > > > [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm2%2BtR%2B8R- > > > > > sD1CSyMbZcZbkintZE-avefjsp7LCkm6HMmw%40mail.gmail.com > > > > > > > > Thanks for fixing it. > > > > > > > > By applying your V10 patch, I saw three problems, please have a look. > > > > > > > > 1. An issue about pg_dump. > > > > When public schema was published, the publication was created in the > > > > output file, but public schema was not added to it. (Other schemas > > > > could be added as expected.) > > > > > > > > I looked into it and found that selectDumpableNamespace function marks > > > DUMP_COMPONENT_DEFINITION as needless when the schema is public, > > > leading to schema public is ignored in getPublicationSchemas. So we'd better > > > check whether schemas should be dumped in another way. > > > > > > > > I tried to fix it with the following change, please have a look. > > > > (Maybe we also need to add some comments for it.) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c > > > > index f6b4f12648..a327d2568b 100644 > > > > --- a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c > > > > +++ b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c > > > > @@ -4206,7 +4206,8 @@ getPublicationSchemas(Archive *fout, > > > NamespaceInfo nspinfo[], int numSchemas) > > > > * Ignore publication membership of schemas whose > > > definitions are not > > > > * to be dumped. > > > > */ > > > > - if (!(nsinfo->dobj.dump & > > > DUMP_COMPONENT_DEFINITION)) > > > > + if (!((nsinfo->dobj.dump & > > > DUMP_COMPONENT_DEFINITION) > > > > + || (strcmp(nsinfo->dobj.name, "public") == 0 > > > > + && nsinfo->dobj.dump != DUMP_COMPONENT_NONE))) > > > > continue; > > > > > > > > pg_log_info("reading publication membership for schema > > > > \"%s\"", > > > > > > I felt it is intentionally done like that as the pubic schema is created by default, > > > hence it is not required to dump else we will get errors while restoring. > > > Thougths? > > > > Thanks for the new patches and I also looked at this issue. > > > > For user defined schema and publication: > > -------------------------- > > create schema s1; > > create publication pub2 for SCHEMA s1; > > -------------------------- > > > > pg_dump will only generate the following SQLs: > > > > ------pg_dump result------ > > CREATE PUBLICATION pub2 WITH (publish = 'insert, update, delete, truncate'); > > ALTER PUBLICATION pub2 ADD SCHEMA s1; > > -------------------------- > > > > But for the public schema: > > -------------------------- > > create publication pub for SCHEMA public; > > -------------------------- > > > > pg_dump will only generate the following SQL: > > > > ------pg_dump result------ > > CREATE PUBLICATION pub WITH (publish = 'insert, update, delete, truncate'); > > -------------------------- > > > > It didn't generate SQL like "ALTER PUBLICATION pub ADD SCHEMA public;" which > > means the public schema won't be published after restoring. So, I think we'd > > better let the pg_dump generate the ADD SCHEMA public SQL. Thoughts ? > > Thanks for reporting this issue, this issue is fixed in the v12 patch attached. > I tested your v12 patch and found a problem in the following case. Step 1: postgres=# create schema s1; CREATE SCHEMA postgres=# create table s1.t1 (a int); CREATE TABLE postgres=# create publication pub_t for table s1.t1; CREATE PUBLICATION postgres=# create publication pub_s for schema s1; CREATE PUBLICATION Step 2: pg_dump -N s1 I dumped and excluded schema s1, pg_dump generated the following SQL: ------------------------------- ALTER PUBLICATION pub_s ADD SCHEMA s1; I think it was not expected because SQL like "ALTER PUBLICATION pub_t ADD TABLE s1.t1" was not generated in my case. Thoughts? Regards Tang
pgsql-hackers by date: