> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:51:24PM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote:
> > Though the patch looks good, I myself think the patch should be edited
> > and submitted by Tang
> > It's easy to attach a fixed patch based on the comments of the thread,
> > but coins should be
> > given to Tang since he is the first one to find the mem leak.
Hello, Zhao
Thanks for your check at this patch.
I appreciate your kindly comment but there may be a misunderstanding here.
As Michael explained, committers in Postgres will review carefully and
help to improve contributors' patches. When the patch is finally committed
by one committer, from what I can see, he or she will try to make sure the
credit goes with everyone who contributed to the committed patch(such as
bug reporter, patch author, tester, reviewer etc.).
Also, developers and reviewers will try to help improving our proposed patch
by rebasing it or adding an on-top patch(like Japin Li did in v2).
These will make the patch better and to be committed ASAP.
Good to see you at Postgres community.
Regards,
Tang
