RE: row filtering for logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: row filtering for logical replication
Date
Msg-id OS0PR01MB5716A7ADC776818C5C6F334494429@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to row filtering for logical replication  (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>)
Responses RE: row filtering for logical replication  ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thur, Dec 23, 2021 4:28 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is the v54* patch set:

Attach the v55 patch set which add the following testcases in 0003 patch.
1. Added a test to cover the case where TOASTed values are not included in the
   new tuple. Suggested by Euler[1].

   Note: this test is temporarily commented because it would fail without
   applying another bug fix patch in another thread[2] which log the detoasted
   value in old value. I have verified locally that the test pass after
   applying the bug fix patch[2].

2. Add a test to cover the case that transform the UPDATE into INSERT. Provided
   by Tang.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6b6cf26d-bf74-4b39-bb07-c067e381d66d%40www.fastmail.com
[2} https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB611342D0A92D4F4BF26C0F47FB229@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com

Best regards,
Hou zj

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Add Boolean node
Next
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: row filtering for logical replication