On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 7:30 PM Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 04:08:23AM +0000, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 9:16 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here is the new version patch which addressed above and most of
> > > Bertrand's comments.
> > >
> > > TODO: trying to add one test for the case the slot is valid on
> > > primary while the synced slots is invalidated on the standby.
> >
> > Here is the V85_2 patch set that added the test and fixed one typo,
> > there are no other code changes.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Out of curiosity I ran a code coverage and the result for slotsync.c can be found
> in [1].
>
> It appears that:
>
> - only one function is not covered (slotsync_failure_callback()).
Thanks for the test ! I think slotsync_failure_callback can be covered easier in the
next slotsync worker patch on worker exit, I will post that after rebasing.
Best Regards,
Hou zj
