Re: Partitions and the optimizer. - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Jayadevan M
Subject Re: Partitions and the optimizer.
Date
Msg-id OFDEFF461F.C16B2587-ON65257790.00136ED5-65257790.0013BDA5@ibsplc.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Partitions and the optimizer.  (Mladen Gogala <mgogala@vmsinfo.com>)
Responses Re: Partitions and the optimizer.
List pgsql-novice
Hello,
> Optimizer doesn't behave well when the tables are partitioned. Here is
> the problem:
>
> news=# explain
> select max("document#") from moreover_documents_y2010m08;
>
> QUERY
> PLAN
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Result  (cost=0.15..0.16 rows=1 width=0)
>    InitPlan 1 (returns $0)
>      ->  Limit  (cost=0.00..0.15 rows=1 width=8)
>            ->  Index Scan Backward using pk_moreover_documents_y2010m08
> on moreover_documents_y2010m08  (cost=0.00..2169871.61 rows=14615132
> width=8)
>                  Filter: ("document#" IS NOT NULL)
> (5 rows)
>
> Time: 31.191 ms
> news=# explain
> select max("document#") from moreover_documents;
>                                                       QUERY
> PLAN
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Aggregate  (cost=4227019.40..4227019.41 rows=1 width=8)
>    ->  Append  (cost=0.00..4145103.32 rows=32766432 width=8)
>          ->  Seq Scan on moreover_documents  (cost=0.00..10.20 rows=20
> width=8)
>          ->  Seq Scan on moreover_documents_y2010m06 moreover_documents
> (cost=0.00..236523.53 rows=1856853 width=8)
>          ->  Seq Scan on moreover_documents_y2010m07 moreover_documents
> (cost=0.00..2073778.27 rows=16294327 width=8)
>          ->  Seq Scan on moreover_documents_y2010m08 moreover_documents
> (cost=0.00..1834740.32 rows=14615132 width=8)
>          ->  Seq Scan on moreover_documents_y2010m09 moreover_documents
> (cost=0.00..10.20 rows=20 width=8)
>          ->  Seq Scan on moreover_documents_y2010m10 moreover_documents
> (cost=0.00..10.20 rows=20 width=8)
>          ->  Seq Scan on moreover_documents_y2010m11 moreover_documents
> (cost=0.00..10.20 rows=20 width=8)
>          ->  Seq Scan on moreover_documents_y2010m12 moreover_documents
> (cost=0.00..10.20 rows=20 width=8)
>          ->  Seq Scan on moreover_documents_y2011m01 moreover_documents
> (cost=0.00..10.20 rows=20 width=8)
> (11 rows)
>
> Time: 31.961 ms
> news=#
>
> I have several partitions for the table, 3 of them are loaded. When I
> search for the maximum value of the primary key column on a single
> partition, the access path is as it should be, using the PK index. Each
> of the partitions has the same PK. When I try selecting the maximum on
> the entire table, the indexes on the partitions are not used, Postgres
> does the full scan instead. The difference in timing is drastic:
> news=# select max("document#") from moreover_documents_y2010m08;
>     max
> ------------
>  1175107508
> (1 row)
>
> Time: 56.778 ms
> news=# select max("document#") from moreover_documents;
>     max
> ------------
>  1175107508
> (1 row)
>
> Time: 200490.228 ms
> news=#
>
> --
I am a PostgreSQL novice myself. So please try my suggestions only if you
have enough time to experiment.
If you try
select max("document#") from (
select "document#" from moreover_documents_y2010m08
union
select "document#" from moreover_documents_xxx
)
would that improve performance?

Regards,
Jayadevan





DISCLAIMER:

"The information in this e-mail and any attachment is intended only for
the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly
contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original communication.
IBS makes no warranty, express or implied, nor guarantees the accuracy,
adequacy or completeness of the information contained in this email or any
attachment and is not liable for any errors, defects, omissions, viruses
or for resultant loss or damage, if any, direct or indirect."






pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Bastiaan Olij
Date:
Subject: Running totals
Next
From: Mladen Gogala
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitions and the optimizer.