Re: BYTEA Fields and Memory Consumption - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Raiford@labware.com
Subject Re: BYTEA Fields and Memory Consumption
Date
Msg-id OFCCF5C501.800D585C-ON85257872.004349FD-85257872.004387CE@labware.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BYTEA Fields and Memory Consumption  (Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Responses Re: BYTEA Fields and Memory Consumption  (Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-odbc
Hi Hiroshi-san,

Thank you for your response.  Could you clarify one thing for me?  Are you suggesting that when using an lo datatype with the lo module installed, the ODBC driver automatically sends the data in pieces?  Or does it only open the possibility for me to use the lo_import() function?  If everything is handled internally in the ODBC driver, it would certainly help a lot :)

Jon



From:        Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To:        Raiford@labware.com
Cc:        pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Date:        04/13/2011 11:42 PM
Subject:        Re: [ODBC] BYTEA Fields and Memory Consumption
Sent by:        pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org




Hi,

(2011/04/13 21:09), Raiford@labware.com wrote:
> I have an issue where even though I break a large BYTEA object up into
> multiple pieces, the ODBC driver just rejoins the pieces in memory and
> tries to send it all out at once. I took a look at the code and sure
> enough the driver just keeps reallocating memory for each chunk of data
> that I add.

Yes you are right.

> Can I assume Postgres has no mechanism to send this data
> across the wire in pieces? Are there any common practices for dealing
> with this?

Please try lo type instead of bytea type.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

> As it is, in one environment I can only transfer files around
> 50MB before I start receiving out of memory errors. The same program
> running against Oracle and SQL Server works great.
>
> Jon


--
Sent via pgsql-odbc mailing list (pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-odbc

pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Josef Springer
Date:
Subject: 08.02.04.00 Updating column with Unicode does not work
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: BYTEA Fields and Memory Consumption