terminating walsender process due to replication timeout - Mailing list pgsql-general
| From | AYahorau@ibagroup.eu |
|---|---|
| Subject | terminating walsender process due to replication timeout |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | OF85C33E30.171C1C23-ON432583F9.003F5B16-432583F9.003FBAD7@iba.by Whole thread Raw |
| Responses |
Re: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout
|
| List | pgsql-general |
Hello PostgreSQL Community!
I faced an issue on my linux machine using Postgres 11.3 .
I have 2 nodes in db cluster: master and standby.
I tried to perform a plenty of long-running queries which lead to the databases desynchronization:
terminating walsender process due to replication timeout
Here is the output in debug mode:
2019-05-13 13:21:33 FET 00000 DEBUG: sending replication keepalive
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: StartTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: CommitTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: END; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: StartTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: CommitTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: END; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: StartTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: CommitTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: END; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: StartTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: CommitTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: END; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: StartTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: CommitTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: END; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: StartTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: CommitTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: END; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 LOG: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout
The issue is reproducible. I configure 2 nodes cluster, download demo_small.zip from https://edu.postgrespro.ru/ and run the following command:
psql -U user1 -f demo_small.sql db1
and I get the observed behaviour.
I know that I can increase wal_sender_timeout value to avoid this behaviour (currently wal_sender_timeout is equal to 1 second.)
To be honest I don't want to increase wal_sender_timeout because I would like to detect some network issues quickly.
After having googled I found that someone faced a similar issue https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e082a56a-fd95-a250-3bae-0fff93832510@2ndquadrant.com which was fixed in PostgreSQL 9.4.16.
Is my issue the same as described here https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e082a56a-fd95-a250-3bae-0fff93832510@2ndquadrant.com ?
Is there any other chance to avoid it without increasing wal_sender_timeout?
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Andrei
I faced an issue on my linux machine using Postgres 11.3 .
I have 2 nodes in db cluster: master and standby.
I tried to perform a plenty of long-running queries which lead to the databases desynchronization:
terminating walsender process due to replication timeout
Here is the output in debug mode:
2019-05-13 13:21:33 FET 00000 DEBUG: sending replication keepalive
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: StartTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: CommitTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: END; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: StartTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: CommitTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: END; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: StartTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: CommitTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: END; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: StartTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: CommitTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: END; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: StartTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: CommitTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: END; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: StartTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 DEBUG: CommitTransaction(1) name: unnamed; blockState: END; state: INPROGRESS, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
2019-05-13 13:21:34 FET 00000 LOG: terminating walsender process due to replication timeout
The issue is reproducible. I configure 2 nodes cluster, download demo_small.zip from https://edu.postgrespro.ru/ and run the following command:
psql -U user1 -f demo_small.sql db1
and I get the observed behaviour.
I know that I can increase wal_sender_timeout value to avoid this behaviour (currently wal_sender_timeout is equal to 1 second.)
To be honest I don't want to increase wal_sender_timeout because I would like to detect some network issues quickly.
After having googled I found that someone faced a similar issue https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e082a56a-fd95-a250-3bae-0fff93832510@2ndquadrant.com which was fixed in PostgreSQL 9.4.16.
Is my issue the same as described here https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e082a56a-fd95-a250-3bae-0fff93832510@2ndquadrant.com ?
Is there any other chance to avoid it without increasing wal_sender_timeout?
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Andrei
pgsql-general by date: