Re: Query about index usage - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jayadevan M
Subject Re: Query about index usage
Date
Msg-id OF37402492.4CF1D42A-ON6525774B.00163B93-6525774B.00177B76@ibsplc.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Analysis Function  (David Jarvis <thangalin@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Query about index usage  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Hello,
> PostgreSQL can't currently avoid reading the table, because that's
> where the tuple visibility information is stored.  We've been making
> progress toward having some way to avoid reading the table for all
> except very recently written tuples, but we're not there yet (in any
> production version or in the 9.0 version to be released this
> summer).
More doubts on how indexes are used by PostgreSQL. It is mentioned that
table data blocks have data about tuple visibility and hence table scans
are always necessary. So how does PostgreSQL reduce the number of blocks
to be read by using indexes? Does this mean that indexes will have
references to all the 'possible' blocks which may contain the data one is
searching for, and then scans all those blocks and eliminates records
which should not be 'visible' to the query being executed? Do index data
get updated as and when data is committed and made 'visible'  or is it
that index data get updated as soon as data is changed, before commit is
issued and rollback of transaction results in a rollback of the index data
changes too?
Regards,
Jayadevan





DISCLAIMER:

"The information in this e-mail and any attachment is intended only for
the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly
contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original communication.
IBS makes no warranty, express or implied, nor guarantees the accuracy,
adequacy or completeness of the information contained in this email or any
attachment and is not liable for any errors, defects, omissions, viruses
or for resultant loss or damage, if any, direct or indirect."






pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Anj Adu
Date:
Subject: Re: slow index lookup
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Query about index usage