I've found the change made in version psqlodbc 8.2.0501 and later (reference: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-10/msg00420.php)
4. Be more careful about <for locking clause> in UseDeclareFetch mode. Add missing? "for read only" clause for read only queries for 8.3 or later servers for safety.
Here is a cvs link to the actual code change: http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/psqlodbc/psqlodbc/convert.c.diff?r1=1.163&r2=1.164
This change breaks existing code that sends a single sql statement with a trailing semicolon. What happens is the odbc driver sees UseDeclareFetch=1 and for sql statements appends " for read only" at the end of the statement. This is fine except for the situation where the statement has a trailing semicolon. In that case the statement ends up being (say) "select blah blah; for read only", which gives a syntax error like:
ERROR: syntax error at or near "for" SQL state: 42601
Setting UseDeclareFetch=0 fixes the problem, or using psqlodbc 8.2.0500 or earlier, or using PostgreSQL 8.2.6--any one of these prevents the " for read only" from being appended to the end of the sql statement.
The quick fix was to remove the trailing semicolons in my code, but a better fix would be to make the parser smart enough to put the " for read only" clause in front of an existing semicolon, not after it.
Thanks...jack -- ******************************************** Who: L Jack Wilson Where: ljwilson@dNiOgSiPtAaMlav.com How: Remove Capital Letters from above for a valid email address Why: Standard Disclaimer fits nicely here.
From:
Hiroshi Inoue Date: Subject:
Re: " for read only" clause appended for safety when UseDeclareFetch=1
breaks some sql statements with trailing semicolons
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
✖
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to Privacy Policy.