Re: Query speed problems - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Peter Darley |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Query speed problems |
Date | |
Msg-id | NNEAICKPNOGDBHNCEDCPAEKGDLAA.pdarley@kinesis-cem.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Query speed problems (Victor Danilchenko <danilche@cs.umass.edu>) |
Responses |
Re: Query speed problems
|
List | pgsql-performance |
Victor, I'm not sure, but I think an exists might be faster for you. It wouldn't have to deal with the Cartesian product of the tables. SELECT DISTINCT maker.* FROM maker WHERE exists (SELECT 1 FROM model WHERE model.maker=maker.id); Thanks, Peter Darley -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Victor Danilchenko Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 12:17 PM To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: [PERFORM] Query speed problems Hi, In the process of developing an API for web/perl/postrgres interactions, I have come up against a peculiar problem; a rather simple query, run on two relatively small tables, takes as much as 0.4 seconds on my development system (it's a P2 266, which in this case is a good thing, as it exposes speed issues). I tried accomplishging the same thing via subqueries and joins, and both methods give me similarly bad result (join query is a little slower, but only a little). The queries I have tested are as follows: SELECT DISTINCT maker.* FROM maker,model WHERE maker.id=model.maker SELECT DISTINCT maker.* FROM maker join model ON maker.id=model.maker The point of the queries is to extract only the maker rows which are referenced from the model table. I would happily use another way to achieve the same end, should anyone suggest it. "maker" has only 137 rows, "model" only 1233 rows. I test the performance in perl, by taking time right before and after query execution. Executing the queries takes anywhere between .3 and .5 seconds, depending on some other factors (removing the 'distinct' keyword from the 1st query shaves about .1 second off of the execution time for example). These execution times seem ridiculous. Any idea what the culprit may be? I hope it's not the text fields, 'cuz those fields are important. Both tables are quite simple: # \d maker Table "public.maker" Column | Type | Modifiers ------------+-----------------------+----------- id | character varying(4) | not null fullname | character varying(20) | contact | character varying(20) | phone | character varying(15) | service_no | character varying(20) | lastuser | character varying(30) | comments | text | Indexes: maker_pkey primary key btree (id) Triggers: RI_ConstraintTrigger_18881, RI_ConstraintTrigger_18882 # \d model Table "public.model" Column | Type | Modifiers ---------------+-----------------------+------------------------------------ --------- id | integer | not null default nextval('model_ids'::text) name | character varying(20) | not null maker | character varying(4) | type_hardware | character varying(4) | fullname | character varying(40) | spec | character varying(50) | lastuser | character varying(30) | comments | text | size_cap | character varying(10) | Indexes: model_pkey primary key btree (id), unique_model unique btree (name, maker, type_hardware) Check constraints: "nonempty_fullname" (fullname > ''::character varying) Foreign Key constraints: valid_maker FOREIGN KEY (maker) REFERENCES \ maker(id) ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION, valid_type FOREIGN KEY (type_hardware) REFERENCES type_hardware(id) ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION -- | Victor Danilchenko | Any sufficiently advanced | | danilche@cs.umass.edu | technology is indistinguishable | | CSCF | 5-4231 | from a Perl script. | ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
pgsql-performance by date: