RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Date
Msg-id NDBBIJLOILGIKBGDINDFAEGLCCAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4  (Nicolas Huillard <nhuillard@ghs.fr>)
Responses Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-general@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Nicolas Huillard
>
> I have a DB with is updated using MS Access. Primary keys are
> Int4 with default random values ("NuméroAuto" + "Aléatoire" in Access).
> The DB is migrated as-is in Postgres, with tbl_prod.cle_prod
> field containing values from -2057496808 to 2139583719.
> When I SELECT in the table, using the INT4 cle_prod value, PG
> doesn't find the tuple. When I SELECT using the VARCHAR(10)
> ref_prod value, PG finds the tuple, and show the right value for
> the cle_prod filed : the same as the one I SELECTed for...
>
> This sounds like the long negative integer values given in PSQL
> is not converted correctly while executing.
> Using a long positive integer value, all works like a charm...
>
> Below is the queries type sto sho what append.
> I'm using Postgres 6.5.2 from the RPMs.
>

Could you try the follwoing patch ?

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue

*** nbtcompare.c        2000/01/11 03:33:34     1.3
--- nbtcompare.c        2000/01/19 05:42:06
***************
*** 34,40 ****
  int32
  btint4cmp(int32 a, int32 b)
  {
!       return a - b;
  }

  int32
--- 34,45 ----
  int32
  btint4cmp(int32 a, int32 b)
  {
!       if (a > b)
!               return 1;
!       else if (a == b)
!               return 0;
!       else
!               return -1;
  }

  int32



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Nicolas Huillard
Date:
Subject: Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4