RE: Big performance slowdown from 11.2 to 13.3 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From ldh@laurent-hasson.com
Subject RE: Big performance slowdown from 11.2 to 13.3
Date
Msg-id MN2PR15MB25603D3CE06C8F9C312EA58985E49@MN2PR15MB2560.namprd15.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Big performance slowdown from 11.2 to 13.3  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses RE: Big performance slowdown from 11.2 to 13.3  ("ldh@laurent-hasson.com" <ldh@laurent-hasson.com>)
List pgsql-performance
OK. Will do another round of testing.


-----Original Message-----
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> 
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 00:44
To: ldh@laurent-hasson.com
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>; Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>;
pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Big performance slowdown from 11.2 to 13.3

On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 16:37, ldh@laurent-hasson.com <ldh@laurent-hasson.com> wrote:
> Seems like no cigar ☹ See plan pasted below. I changed the conf as follows:
>   - hash_mem_multiplier = '2'
>   - work_mem = '1GB'

>         Batches: 5  Memory Usage: 2400305kB  Disk Usage: 126560kB

You might want to keep going higher with hash_mem_multiplier until you see no "Disk Usage" there.  As mentioned, v11
didn'tspill to disk and just used all the memory it pleased.  That was a bit dangerous as it could result in OOM, so it
wasfixed.
 

David

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioned table statistics vs autoanalyze
Next
From: Manoj Kumar
Date:
Subject: Performance Issue on a table