On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 at 08:03, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:43:40AM +0800, Japin Li wrote:
>> # Allow running this even without --with-python
>> PYTHON ?= python
>>
>> $(srcdir)/unaccent.rules: generate_unaccent_rules.py ../../src/common/unicode/UnicodeData.txt Latin-ASCII.xml
>> $(PYTHON) $< --unicode-data-file $(word 2,$^) --latin-ascii-file $(word 3,$^) >$@
>>
>> It use python to run generate_unaccent_rules.py, However, the ?= operator in
>> Makefile only check variable is defined or not, but do not check variable is
>> empty. Since the PYTHON is defined in src/Makefile.global, so here PYTHON
>> get empty when without --with-ptyhon.
>
> I am not sure that many people run this script frequently so that may
> not be worth adding a check for a defined, still empty or incorrect
Yeah, not frequently, however, it already be used by me, since we provide this
function, why not make it better?
> value, but.. If you were to change the Makefile we use in this path,
> how are you suggesting to change it?
I provide a patch at bottom of in [1]. Attached here again.
diff --git a/contrib/unaccent/Makefile b/contrib/unaccent/Makefile
index 652a3e774c..3ff49ba1e9 100644
--- a/contrib/unaccent/Makefile
+++ b/contrib/unaccent/Makefile
@@ -26,7 +26,9 @@ endif
update-unicode: $(srcdir)/unaccent.rules
# Allow running this even without --with-python
-PYTHON ?= python
+ifeq ($(PYTHON),)
+PYTHON = python
+endif
$(srcdir)/unaccent.rules: generate_unaccent_rules.py ../../src/common/unicode/UnicodeData.txt Latin-ASCII.xml
$(PYTHON) $< --unicode-data-file $(word 2,$^) --latin-ascii-file $(word 3,$^) >$@
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/MEYP282MB1669F86C0DC7B4DC48489CB0B6C3A@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
--
Regrads,
Japin Li
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
