Re: Identify missing publications from publisher while create/alter subscription. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | japin |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Identify missing publications from publisher while create/alter subscription. |
Date | |
Msg-id | MEYP282MB16693D5A0669348299AFBD89B6A00@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Identify missing publications from publisher while create/alter subscription. (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Identify missing publications from publisher while create/alter subscription.
Re: Identify missing publications from publisher while create/alter subscription. |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 00:51, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:56 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Creating/altering subscription is successful when we specify a >> publication which does not exist in the publisher. I felt we should >> throw an error in this case, that will help the user to check if there >> is any typo in the create subscription command or to create the >> publication before the subscription is created. >> If the above analysis looks correct, then please find a patch that >> checks if the specified publications are present in the publisher and >> throws an error if any of the publications is missing in the >> publisher. >> Thoughts? > > I was having similar thoughts (while working on the logical > replication bug on alter publication...drop table behaviour) on why > create subscription succeeds without checking the publication > existence. I checked in documentation, to find if there's a strong > reason for that, but I couldn't. Maybe it's because of the principle > "first let users create subscriptions, later the publications can be > created on the publisher system", similar to this behaviour > "publications can be created without any tables attached to it > initially, later they can be added". > > Others may have better thoughts. > > If we do check publication existence for CREATE SUBSCRIPTION, I think > we should also do it for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET PUBLICATION. > Agreed. Current patch do not check publication existence for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET PUBLICATION ... WITH (refresh = false). > I wonder, why isn't dropping a publication from a list of publications > that are with subscription is not allowed? > > Some comments so far on the patch: > > 1) I see most of the code in the new function check_publications() and > existing fetch_table_list() is the same. Can we have a generic > function, with maybe a flag to separate out the logic specific for > checking publication and fetching table list from the publisher. +1 > 2) Can't we know whether the publications exist on the publisher with > the existing (or modifying it a bit if required) query in > fetch_table_list(), so that we can avoid making another connection to > the publisher system from the subscriber? IIUC, the patch does not make another connection, it just execute a new query in already connection. If we want to check publication existence for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET PUBLICATION ... WITH (refresh = false) we should make another connection. > 3) If multiple publications are specified in the CREATE SUBSCRIPTION > query, IIUC, with your patch, the query fails even if at least one of > the publications doesn't exist. Should we throw a warning in this case > and allow the subscription be created for other existing > publications? > +1. If all the publications do not exist, we should throw an error. -- Regrads, Japin Li. ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.
pgsql-hackers by date: