On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 14:54, Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Japin,
>
> Thanks, the patch looks good to me.
>
> However, as a non-native English speaker, it might not be accurate.
>> Feel free to modify it.
>>
>>
> I'm also not good at wording, but I have a minor suggestions like the
> following :
>
> /*
> * Also, the FETCH FIRST/NEXT ... ROW/ROWS WITH TIES clause cannot be
> pushed down
> * because:
> * a) The remote system may have a different understanding of equality,
> which can
> * result in varying results, such as non-deterministic collations.
> * b) We do not have knowledge of the remote server's version
> * as this clause is only supported for PG13 and above.
> */
>
Thanks for your review! Fixed in v5 patch.
--
Regards,
Japin Li
