On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 17:18, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
> On 2025-Apr-17, Japin Li wrote:
>
>> It seems PG 16 does not support exclusion constraints on partitioned tables.
>
> Yeah, my recollection is that they were purposefully disallowed (mainly
> because I didn't want to research how to fully make them work when
> adding local partitioned indexes), and that we needed to do more work if
> we wanted to let them through. I suspect commit 8c852ba9a4 was mistaken
> to allow that case without looking for further implications.
>
Sorry, I’m unclear on “more work.” Can you explain further?
--
Regrads,
Japin Li
