>Karel Zak wrote
> On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 18:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Can anyone think of a reason we aren't inlining
> MemoryContextSwitchTo()
> > in GCC builds, similarly to the way list_head() et al are handled?
> >
> > It wouldn't be a huge gain, but I consistently see
> MemoryContextSwitchTo
> > eating a percent or three of most profiles.
>
> Sounds good.
>
> I think we can inlining all MemoryContext functions which check memory
> context header and call context->metods->...() only. An example
> MemoryContextAlloc() that is very often called from code too.
Yes, thats good.
But why MemoryContextSwitchTo ? That seems to come out much lower than
MemoryContextAllocZeroAligned or MemoryContextAlloc on the profiles I've
seen.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
