回复: Core dump happens when execute sql CREATE VIEW v1(c1) AS (SELECT ('4' COLLATE "C")::INT FROM generate_series(1, 10)); - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yulin PEI
Subject 回复: Core dump happens when execute sql CREATE VIEW v1(c1) AS (SELECT ('4' COLLATE "C")::INT FROM generate_series(1, 10));
Date
Msg-id HK0PR01MB22744F40FD13E47352A3F54BF44A9@HK0PR01MB2274.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Core dump happens when execute sql CREATE VIEW v1(c1) AS (SELECT ('4' COLLATE "C")::INT FROM generate_series(1, 10));  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
    After several tests, I found that this patch do not fix the bug well. 

    I think we should use the same logic to treat parent CollateExpr and child CollateExpr. In your patch, if the parent node is CollateExpr and the target type is non-collatable,  we coerce CollateExpr->arg. If the child node is CollateExpr and the target type is non-collatable, we just skip.  
    Some types can be casted to another type even if  type_is_collatable returns false. Like bytea to int (It depends on the content of the string). If we simply skip,  bytea will never be casted to int even if the content is all digits.

So the attachment is my patch and it works well as far as I tested.




发件人: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
发送时间: 2021年4月13日 0:59
收件人: Yulin PEI <ypeiae@connect.ust.hk>
抄送: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
主题: Re: Core dump happens when execute sql CREATE VIEW v1(c1) AS (SELECT ('4' COLLATE "C")::INT FROM generate_series(1, 10));
 
Yulin PEI <ypeiae@connect.ust.hk> writes:
>     I found it could cause a crash when executing sql statement: `CREATE VIEW v1(c1) AS (SELECT ('4' COLLATE "C")::INT FROM generate_series(1, 10)); ` in postgres 13.2 release.

Nice catch.  I don't think the code in DefineVirtualRelation is wrong:
exprCollation shouldn't report any collation for an expression of a
non-collatable type.  Rather the problem is with an old kluge in
coerce_type(), which will push a type coercion underneath a CollateExpr
... without any mind for the possibility that the coercion result isn't
collatable.  So the right fix is more or less the attached.

                        regards, tom lane

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: 2 questions about volatile attribute of pg_proc.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "could not find pathkey item to sort" for TPC-DS queries 94-96