Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump
Date
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEEACEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com> writes:
> > This seems like a "must" have option for pg_dump,
> > If I was to create a patch would it make it into 7.3?
> 
> I dunno ... I'd like to have it too, but it would break our "no new
> features during beta" rule.  Comments anyone?

I don't see a huge reason to stick to that rule in this instance...

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: directional marks
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?