Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 200209170529.g8H5T0w28616@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com> writes:
> > > This seems like a "must" have option for pg_dump,
> > > If I was to create a patch would it make it into 7.3?
> > 
> > I dunno ... I'd like to have it too, but it would break our "no new
> > features during beta" rule.  Comments anyone?
> 
> I don't see a huge reason to stick to that rule in this instance...

Reclassify it as a bug ... problem solved.  ;-)

Actually, it is sort of a bug because it is something we should have
added for schemas but forgot.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?