Re: New manual chapters - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: New manual chapters
Date
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOEEIGCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New manual chapters  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: New manual chapters  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > You say:
> > "All drop commands in PostgreSQL support specifying CASCADE. Of course"
> > Which isn't technically true for the ALTER TABLE/DROP NOT NULL
> statement..
>
> Come to think of it, that's probably a bug: you should not be able to
> DROP NOT NULL on a column that's part of a PRIMARY KEY.  Unless you
> cascade to remove the primary key, that is.

I did ask you about this before, Tom :)

The DROP NOT NULL code I submitted will not allow you to drop a not null on
a column that participates in a primary key.  I was very careful about that.
So basically, it's a restrict-only implementation.  Although it would be
fairly easy I guess to make it support cascade and restrict keywords...?
Perhaps not thru the dependency mechanism, but it can be done explicitly.

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: New manual chapters
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for psql wildcarding behavior w/schemas