Re: possible vacuum improvement? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: possible vacuum improvement?
Date
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOCEAJCEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: possible vacuum improvement?  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Responses Re: possible vacuum improvement?  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Actually that's what I did. Update global  transaction counter
> than trigger the
> vacuum from a spare thread.
>
> but having it in DB has advantages of centralisation. It's just a
> good to have
> kind of thing..

Care to submit it as a BSD licensed contrib module then?  Or at least create
a project for it on http://gborg.postgresql.org/ ?

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mario Weilguni"
Date:
Subject: Re: possible vacuum improvement?
Next
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: possible vacuum improvement?