On 19-aug-2007, at 12:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> An additional problem with your proposal is that it fails to consider
> other changes that might be happening concurrently -- eg, what if some
> other backend deletes a source row after you copy it, and commits
> before
> you do?
then the patch indeed failed, but when I change it to check those
carried over FKs also once, it catches it correctly.
are there other such issues? or is this kind of optimization not
going in no matter what?
Lodewijk
