Re: BUG #14328: SELECT FOR UPDATE doesn't return existing row - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Andomar
Subject Re: BUG #14328: SELECT FOR UPDATE doesn't return existing row
Date
Msg-id FEDF49DE-8374-4776-A55A-64D3FE50669B@aule.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #14328: SELECT FOR UPDATE doesn't return existing row  (imyfess@gmail.com)
List pgsql-bugs
I can reproduce this on 9.4 on Debian Linux.

This relates to a question on Stack Overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/q/395=
50510/50552

The row seems to be dropped from the result set after the query waits on the=
 lock.

Cheers,
Andomar

> On 19 Sep 2016, at 18:01, imyfess@gmail.com wrote:
>=20
> 14328

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: imyfess@gmail.com
Date:
Subject: BUG #14328: SELECT FOR UPDATE doesn't return existing row
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #14319: Logical decoding dropping statements in subtransactions