Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE
Date
Msg-id FEBF326D-A4FE-4D38-B87F-DC14AB364E12@justatheory.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Aug 29, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:

> Still I don't think so correct solution is enabling a unbound SELECTs, but correct is a fix a PERFORM and remove a
necessityto use a PERFORM for call of VOID functions. 

Well, in this thread, I believe you are the only person who feels that way. And this proposal still would not let
PERFORMwork with CTEs. 

Best,

David

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Master-slave visibility order