<p><font size="2">Hi Jonah,<br /><br /> > Still, you should UNION the result of<br /> > both exceptions into a
singleresult set.<br /><br /> Great suggestion. Many thanks.<br /><br /> Regards,<br /><br /> Tena Sakai<br />
tsakai@gallo.ucsf.edu<br/><br /><br /> -----Original Message-----<br /> From: Jonah H. Harris [<a
href="mailto:jonah.harris@gmail.com">mailto:jonah.harris@gmail.com</a>]<br/> Sent: Thu 3/20/2008 12:21 PM<br /> To:
TenaSakai<br /> Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org<br /> Subject: Re: [SQL] compare 2 tables in sql<br /><br /> On Thu, Mar
20,2008 at 1:44 PM, Tena Sakai <tsakai@gallo.ucsf.edu> wrote:<br /> > Just a postscript. It is important to
check<br/> > both ways. Because (sometimes) vice versa is<br /> > not necessarily true. Case in point
below:<br/><br /> Yes, I'm well aware of that. Still, you should UNION the result of<br /> both exceptions into a
singleresult set.<br /><br /> --<br /> Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324<br /> EnterpriseDB
Corporation| fax: 732.331.1301<br /> 499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah.harris@enterprisedb.com<br /> Edison, NJ
08837| <a href="http://www.enterprisedb.com/">http://www.enterprisedb.com/</a><br /><br /></font>
